But the situation is serious in many areas

Ms Parisot has violently criticized the principle of the debate announced by the President of the Republic on "sharing of added value and profits, as well as on pay gaps. The posture of the President of the Medef is revealed before any ideological: the wealth of business and the remuneration of officials is a matter of shareholders and directions! Move along, there is nothing to see!

While companies decide deletions of jobs by the thousands, the end of the bar a bit more supports employees in the idea that they are "the last wheel of the bus." But this is not a problem of sense. The question of the Division of the added value "is an important element of the dynamics of economic developments," pointed out, already ten years ago, the Insee. The unions claim a right of control over the use that the resource companies they have (own resources, public aid, credits...) and criteria that justify the choice of management.

That a company makes profit is not wrong. Remains how to generate and use that is made. But the situation is serious in many areas. The production run. A two-digit profitability requirement selected companies, industrial projects, but also production sites and the categories of employees deemed employable. The result is a huge mess at the level of the entire country, as reflected in the employment rate extremely low France and potential growth, barely more than 1 for the next thirty years.

In addition, from the time when a significant share of the profits has ceased to originate from the production of goods and services, and was the result of simple investment transactions, do not wonder that work, research and training have been elastic load figure.

To justify this sharing of wealth, it said and reiterated to the employees that the profits were expected to make the investments for the future. In fact, the profitability of large enterprises found the level of the beginning of the 1970s. The performance of the own funds of the French companies in the CAC 40 a, on the other hand, increased by 55 since 1996! Consideration has been a deterioration of the situation of a majority of small and medium-sized enterprises, and a relative decrease in the investment effort.

On the other hand, companies have privileged financial, more profitable investments in the short term. For those that are listed, they branched into expensive share buyback programs to meet the shareholders instead of investment for development. According to the results of the national accounts, the share of the profits distributed to all companies, excluding banks and insurance, increased 45 in ten years! In contrast, pressure on wages is translated by relative stagnation of domestic markets which particularly affects the development of the fabric of small and medium-sized businesses.

The France and Europe took the delay. We produce fewer goods and services related to new technologies of the information that the United States. We have a significantly smaller proportion of sectors that use them. Now, the competition comes on this land of China, the India of the Brazil.

If something well compromise the future, it is the inadequacy of expenditure for training, research, work and the men and women globally. While the current ratio of share of value added (65-35) is optimal is a nonsense. Without a new share of value added, the "knowledge society" concept should also discuss produce his backhand, a mass traced and exclusion. How not to measure the danger of such choices in a global context where research, new technologies and qualified employment play more and more a strategic role.

A more qualified, properly paid work, will find its place in the economic circuit, as an element of "effective demand". Recognize this need requires a less greedy capital. Academe Ms Parisot, will have a new sharing of wealth and economic power to accompany a new type of productivity.