Then arises the miracle solution selected immigration

Men and women are moving more and more. Encouraged by everything: the quest still resurgent, still unsatisfactory a elsewhere where the grass is greener. the great development of the means of information, which identifies each better and better every corner of the planet, its advantages and disadvantages; the explosion of the transport and increasingly lower cost; Finally, the proliferation and sophistication of network organizing the journey of migrants. Rich countries stiff in this anarchic turbulence; as pointed out by a former Prime Minister, they are not there to accommodate the misery of the world. Then arises the miracle solution: selected immigration. As well the place to be migrants, choose those that will be useful! Mr. Jordan, follower of common sense, would not have thought otherwise. Unfortunately, the chosen immigration, it does not work!

Since the dawn of time, men still migrate for the same reason: leaving land where they do more to live, to find another who will be more generous. Migration are not enacted by Governments, they are caused by social and economic factors: development gaps, richness, stand. Most often, the poor are attracted by the scene of prosperity. Sometimes that overcrowded areas "expel" a part of their population, it is pushed to other in principle less hostile skies (after thus, today, the Chinese surplus rural peasants crowding into cities). Migrations are the movements of the water; they bypass the dams, sneaking in smaller gaps, emerging there where it is not expected.

Since the 1970s, European States, while ending officially any immigration, have had to accommodate these circulations by adjustments to repetition of the illegal immigrants. The sink is filling inexorably, it must be the empty! Why not return migrants in their home Rich democracies would pay dearly. They sèmeraient in the regions of starting an unpardonable grudge. In addition, these democracies live in and by the Exchange; in is barricadant, they condemn themselves to slow but inevitable depletion. Then what to do Probably control immigration, while never forgetting that water has the mobility, the freedom of life.

According to the schema of the selected immigration, there are "good" immigrants useful migrants and 'bad' immigrants the unnecessary. But what are the useful What are the unnecessary Individuals Bacon degrees would be most necessary; at the same time the poor types not procrastinating before the hardest tasks on sites masons, painters, nursing... proved indispensable in a France and possibly a Europe who feel little manual work.

The "good" migrant, if there is one, is it not simply that, whatever its social level, fighting for a better life The superdiplômé, flowing through required procedures, may well be a dry fruit. Rather than to decide top which must be elected, must be rejected, would it not wiser to let life live in clear to facilitate the free meeting of supply and demand for labor But should we not reserve jobs for nationals Since the decision of the immigration of workers in the 1970s, unemployment, not be stopped, has almost constantly increased!

More broadly, the problem of migrants changes radically. The traditional migrant is an unfortunate without rights, happy to find a job and knowing that to keep the job, it must shut up. This caricature reality is dying. The migrant of today is otherwise heard, at least informed. It is surrounded by many actors: traffickers of labour but also non-governmental organizations, lawyers, media... The migrant taira less and less.

In addition, international and national law, him also as water penetrates all social relationships. The migrant is and will be more and more to assert its rights, are and will be debated before the courts, including the European Court of human rights. "Choose" migrants, is it not deny the obvious: migrants are human beings first free